girlofprey: (Simpsons Coloured Underwear)
[personal profile] girlofprey
I got back from Connotations yesterday. It was a bit odd this year, I think because I hadn't made sure to have enough sleep before going so I was tired a lot, and because I'm not really watching any shows at the moment apart from soaps. Between the Wylde storyline on Emmerdale finishing really soon and the Ste/Brendan storyline on Hollyoaks just starting up and them doing quite a bit with them onscreen, I'm a bit soap mad at the moment, and suprisingly few people wanted to talk with me about Nathan Wylde (OH I LOVE HIM) for 3 hours. But it was lovely to be there and lovely to see everyone, and we had a fancy new hotel I was incredibly impressed with. I was with [livejournal.com profile] jekesta and [livejournal.com profile] cakesy, and our triple room (aka double room with a camp bed) had a sitting room/entertaining area. I kid you not. Also, there were three course meals basically every night, and suited hotel staff kept bringing random trays of cake and smoothies out every time we had a break. And I think the rooms only cost about the same as they did at the Park. It was awesome, especially when we learned our way around.

I don't have much to say about the panels, except that looking back it's kind of hilarious how quickly the Anti-Heroes (Not Villains) panel became all about villains. Also, we learned a bit more about what that The Losers film [livejournal.com profile] katemonkey keeps talking about is all about. Also, I found out about the Futurama Citihall vid. Also, [livejournal.com profile] jekesta, [livejournal.com profile] cakesy and I all looked Moderately Tidy at the Moderately Tidy Dinner. Also, it was pretty awesome.

[livejournal.com profile] cakesy and I were going to go see a film together or something yesterday after leaving the hotel, but we were foiled by the fact that Durham only has one cinema with two screens, and there was nothing on there till 3 and there was nothing we really wanted to see on. So we decided getting the train was probably the best thing to do, especially with our suitcases and whatnot. An extra exciting bonus of the week for me was that on the way up on the train, I saw a couple of deer out of the window, and I couldn't decide if they were fauns or not. They were quite small. And on the way down I saw deer again, and then a fox, and then another fox. It's probably a bit ridiculous how pleased I am about seeing random wildlife, but I spent most of my childhood in my bedroom, and I didn't exactly start going on nature walks when I got to be a teenager. And apparently when I was young there was a fox living somewhere near our cul-de-sac which used to wander around the houses sometimes, and when I was living in Beeston with K and J she said there were urban foxes about which she and J saw once or twice coming back from nights out, and I never saw either of those. So it's nice to actually see apparently really common animals now and then. Also, DEER. That was really lovely.

Today I mostly ventured out of the house to go uptown and get the new soap mags, which I buy totally for the articles, and by no means for the pictures of Ste and Nathan Wylde. That doesn't make it better, does it? Anyway, there's a couple of really hilarious interviews in there with Amanda Donohoe insisting that Natasha Wylde is at heart an honest person, and that everything she's done she did to protect her family, and then giving really vague answers to whether or not Natasha would confess to killing her husband if she found out Nathan might be tortured or killed over it. YOU HAVE TO THINK THESE THINGS OVER.

In other news about what telly I've been watching, I had an incredibly ITV night last night. It started out with Hollyoaks at 6.30, then at 7.00 it was Emmerdale, at 7.30 it was Coronation Street, at 8.00 I went upstairs to watch Ray Mears' new thing, then back downstairs at 8.30 for Coronation Street again, then new Whitechapel at 9. This year's plot seems slightly more ludicrous than last year's, and some of the tension has gone now that the whole team seems to love Chandler, but it's still pretty enjoyable. And I quite love Chandler/Miles. Although Chandler/Kent is quite sweet too. And this year there is Suprise Peter Serafinowicz. As an insane policeman. So we'll see how that goes.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-10-13 07:56 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I still haven't typed up all my Emmerdale notes from last week, BUT I have now seen Brendan on Hollyoaks (I knew who Ste was, obviously) and OMG, that is not what I was expecting him to look like. I am now intrigued by this plotline, might have to start giving Hollyoaks the occasional look once the Wyldes have gone :(

ALSO, there are some quite incredible Nathan spoilers about (for week after next - I found them on Digital Spy last night). But I won't say any more in case you haven't read them.

I am still kind of surprised Natasha hasn't just gone ahead and told the police it was Nathan - alright, supposedly she loves him, but she's into self-protection more and she does seem to have taken every other opportunity to fuck him up. And if she did, I'm not sure there's a way he could get out of it.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-10-13 07:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hestia8.livejournal.com
Shit, that was me, forgot to log in.

Oh, also! Does this mean you didn't see Casualty? I didn't either...

(no subject)

Date: 2010-10-13 04:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] girlofprey.livejournal.com
No, I was doing con stuff. But my parents recorded it and I'm going to try to find a time to watch it before this Saturday's episode.

Brendan's odd, isn't he?? He's sort of incredibly ridiculous, but also really sinister when he gets mad. And I think they're doing the UST REALLY WELL. Hollyoaks is a strange show to be getting back into, and I know this is probably going to be a pretty painful storyline when it really gets going, but I'm enjoying it so far.

I know all the Nathan spoilers. I did a post with all the spoilers I knew a week or two ago, and since buying the latest soap mags (yeah, I know) yesterday I know pretty much exactly what will happen. It's pretty much as I feared. But it sort of gives me hope for how the storyline will turn out in other ways, which I won't go into until I know that you have heard the same things as me.

It's just really ridiculous, I know Amanda Donohoe must have to look for the good in her character to be able to play her and play her well, and to not give things away I guess. And some of the things she says make sense. But she keeps saying things like she thinks Natasha the good one really, and Nathan's the evil one, and it just doesn't really make any sense. But again, maybe she's just trying to not give things away. I don't know how the whole storyline will turn out, still, I guess.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-10-14 02:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hestia8.livejournal.com
Yeah, the episode I saw was just weird. Although I have now seen spoilers in the soap mags and I can see how it works. Hm.

I was confused by this and then remembered that I avoided all the Emmerdale posts of *anything* last week so I wouldn't be spoiled about the crash. And then forgot to go back and read them so I will get on that.

It does sound really odd, although there is such an overwhelming 'Nathan is a bastard' meme I suppose it's one of those things people say without looking at the actual show. Or maybe she is just trying not to give things away. But really, Natasha did actually kill her husband. Hm.

I shall go look for spoilers now...

(no subject)

Date: 2010-10-14 11:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] girlofprey.livejournal.com
It's so strange. I always remember this interview I read with her a year or so ago - I don't read many, but I remember this one - where she said she felt that Natasha was "a basically good woman who'd been pushed to the edge on one occasion", and that it was sad for her because "she doesn't know how evil Nathan can be", or words to that effect, and I just... I know he's done some bad things, and it was an incredibly emotional situation when she shot Mark, but she didn't just do one thing. She killed him, then she buried him, then she hid it from her children SCARILY WELL, then she told her son but lied just enough that he'd be a bit more sympathetic towards her, hopefully. And since then she's basically been almost continually emotionally manipulating/abusing him into helping her cover it up. WHEN SHE TOLD HIM HE WANTED TO GO TO THE POLICE AND SHE TOLD HIM TO STOP BEING ABSURD. She must either know that it is fucking him up, or if it isn't, that's because he's already INCREDIBLY FUCKED UP and she just doesn't care. And I don't even know. I'm not claiming he's not done anything wrong, but for anyone to be able to say that he has and she hasn't is just a bit unbelievable. AND SHE MUST WATCH THE SHOW, SHE IS IN THE SHOW. SHE'S A BIG PART OF THE SHOW. I don't know. Maybe she is just trying to not give things away. Otherwise I don't understand what she's talking about.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-10-16 03:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hestia8.livejournal.com
What's funny is that for a while I sort of bought it - and until she really got him to help with covering it up - you could buy that she'd done something stupid and panicked and was now trying to fix it without admitting the truth, fair enough.

And then she got Nathan to fix everything while blaming him for it and letting everyone around them think he was a murderer, and you kind of go 'ok, not such a good person after all'.

Page generated Jun. 30th, 2025 01:21 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »